Re: MOL Long-time reliability question

Subject: Re: MOL Long-time reliability question
From: Joseph E. Curtis (clotter@mac.com)
Date: Thu Jun 28 2001 - 08:22:41 MDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Stephen Prause: "Re: using kernel 2.4.2 with mol"
• Previous message: Brice D Ruth: "Re: (Revisiting) Using airport- doesn't anyone know?"
• In reply to: Andrei Verovski: "MOL Long-time reliability question"
• Reply: Joseph E. Curtis: "Re: MOL Long-time reliability question"

Andrei Verovski wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Can anyone share any experience regarding MOL long-time uptime
> reliability?
>
> I am going to run MOL on high-loaded Linux Server (G4/400 + SuSE 7.1
> PPC/2.4.2 kernel), but I have no idea how reliable MOL is when running
> for a months (I am need some MacOS apps on server to be run 24/7).
>
> Also, what version of MOL should I use? At this time I have 0.9.58-1
> without any problem on my iBook. Should I rsync latest version, or
> continue to use 0.9.58-1?
>
> Thanks in advance for any advice.
>
> ********************************************************
> * Best Regards --- Andrei Verovski *
> * e-mail --- andrei.verovski@bigfoot.com *
> * *
> * Personal Home Page *
> * http://homepage.mac.com/macgurutemple/ *
> ********************************************************U

Hi, A data point for you ...

Using Linux PPC/Q4 on a TiPB G4, 2.4.5-pre3 I have been running
Mol-0.9.58-1
24/7 for over a month with out any troubles.

Cheers,

Joseph

• Next message: Stephen Prause: "Re: using kernel 2.4.2 with mol"
• Previous message: Brice D Ruth: "Re: (Revisiting) Using airport- doesn't anyone know?"
• In reply to: Andrei Verovski: "MOL Long-time reliability question"
• Reply: Joseph E. Curtis: "Re: MOL Long-time reliability question"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Thu Jun 28 2001 - 10:26:31 MDT