MOL future plans

[Stefan Jeglinski]

>samuel@ibrium.se writes:
>
>>  The main reason why I'm considering KDE is because I find the
>>  API superior. An alternative would be writing it using QT or
>>  perhaps just a ncursor based menu system.
>
>ncurses would really make more sense, since MOL can run from
>a console, and you might not even want X on your machine but
>still want MOL.

Yet an even better reason (no X) for my vote for a menuconfig-like 
system. I sometimes config, start, and stop mol exclusively from afar 
through ssh. Although I can edit the config file in emacs just fine 
thru ssh, a menu-based config program would be nice.

Also, I note that a mol installation from build always writes over 
the molrc file. There is no automatic 'save old config' step, like 
there might be in an rpm install. I always have to save the old one, 
and swap them out. If I forget to do this, I have to go through it 
again by hand...


Stefan Jeglinski