nice makes mol more responsive?

[David Paul BELANGER]

--O3RTKUHj+75w1tg5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Hello,

In an attempt to make the sound skip less, I increased mol priority with
nice.  It did not make improvement on the sound by I had the impression
that Mac OS X was running faster and was more responsive.  I didn't do
any timing measurements however.

In case you want to try it, you can use the "nice" command or you can
"r"enice it in top.  Let me know if you think the same thing.

David

---

David B=E9langer
Graduate Student
School of Computer Science
McGill University
Office: MC226

Web page:   http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~dbelan2/
Public key: http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~dbelan2/public_key.txt


--O3RTKUHj+75w1tg5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE+RDX5O0s9k0zfavcRAiGzAJoDOqsusSLudEaZlhW811Irb+H5rgCfS4Gr
soXkaojnxFw5wpOW28CNpws=
=xxvF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--O3RTKUHj+75w1tg5--