Converting OS X AddressBook to KAddress?

[Robert Brandtjen]

On Wednesday 21 August 2002 02:03 am, dylan wrote:
> shut it robert

OKAY dylan - do you offer serious advice to the linux kernel list like ti=
m as=20
well?
Begin quote:
   -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yesterday, Timothy A. Seufert (tas@appsig.com) wrote:

  > Why not take it a step further than just devices?  This is a perfect
  > model for supporting named forks.
 >In fact, I believe this is how MacOS X is exposing HFS+ named forks to
 >the UNIX side of things.  (HFS+ supports not just the old style
 >Macintosh data and resource forks but an arbitrary number of named
 >forks.)

Because this only works on filesystems where directories can't themselves
have named forks (or streams, or whatever you wish to call them)
associated with them.

Read the archives on this issue :)

Mo.

- --=20
Mo McKinlay                   mmckinlay@gnu.org           http://ekto.org
Read http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt

End quote
--=20
 Robert Brandtjen
 --------------------------------------
 Web Site Creation and Hosting Services
 Hostmaster@prometheusmedia.com
 www.prometheusmedia.com