apache 1.3.26?

[Konstantin Riabitsev]

--=-Vpp3UgxfObg0Yh0pd+/W
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 14:32, Keary Suska wrote:

> > You don't really gain much by wanting 1.3.26. You
> > can also try rebuilding apache-1.3.23-14 from the 7.3 updates -- it
> > should work just fine as well without the gotchas of trying to use an
> > RPM from some other distro or building things from source.
>=20
> If you don't care that you are running a daemon with a well known remote
> exploit, then I guess you shouldn't be concerned with the newer version.
> Being the administrator at a University I would think that you would sinc=
e
> University systems are the most often compromised and used to proxy attac=
ks.
> But then, considering your sentiment about upgrading Apache, it stands to
> reason.

Apache-1.3.23-14 is patched for this vulnerability.=20

Now please apologize for insulting me.

--=20
 0>  Konstantin ("Icon") Riabitsev
/ )  Duke University Physics Sysadmin
 ~   www.phy.duke.edu/~icon/pubkey.asc

--=-Vpp3UgxfObg0Yh0pd+/W
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEABECAAYFAj0XexQACgkQlVxa81EWb4jLkQCcC8OKCOhcAQmaBpPC0sgJ5B4/
7PAAn0cMJR6cNvgelg4iqjNv9iiqOc6x
=WAVW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-Vpp3UgxfObg0Yh0pd+/W--