apache 1.3.26?
Konstantin Riabitsev
yellowdog-general@lists.terrasoftsolutions.com
Mon Jun 24 17:27:00 2002
--=-QXiUsj2YtyPZ15fGrC5+
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 18:31, Paul J. Lucas wrote:
> > So, you are effectively doing the same thing that RPM does, just in you=
r
> > own way?
>=20
> But the *point* is that it's *my* Apache configured how *I*
> want it.
No, the *point* is that you are doing a binary package and RPM is far
better suited for that than a tarball. Nobody prevents you from
modifying the .spec file for the apache RPM to build *your* apache.
> Also, last I checked, RPM doesn't know about taking machines
> out of server load balancing rotation.
That's not a very good example. I can throw things like dependencies
back at you and we'll be going on till we get bored.
--=20
0> Konstantin ("Icon") Riabitsev
/ ) Duke University Physics Sysadmin
~ www.phy.duke.edu/~icon/pubkey.asc
--=-QXiUsj2YtyPZ15fGrC5+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEABECAAYFAj0XqwUACgkQlVxa81EWb4hVSgCfQUlE/ZTrwsO5S3lhGZPWmLhd
xTQAn3PB2rNvcqbIIk3edEY86fFf1HK1
=T45L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-QXiUsj2YtyPZ15fGrC5+--