OT: RAM (DDR) speed
Ron Smith
yellowdog-general@lists.terrasoftsolutions.com
Sat Jun 28 04:22:01 2003
Well, as with many performance oriented questions, there is no straight
answer that I can think of to give you on this one....
It is true that in terms of physical performance there is not a *lot*
to be gained from DDR 333 vs. DDR 266.
Having said that, in many opinions the choking point of Macs has been
the front side bus speed of the Mac (PPC) processors and truthfully
their speed has lagged significantly behind that of the Intel
processors in raw speed. That significantly changed with the G5
processor. Now the question remains on whether the DDR 333 (or possibly
the 266) can "feed" the processors pipeline at a fast and efficient
rate to keep it operating at an optimum performance level. On a
theoretical level, this could be easy to figure out mathematically, but
in real world terms where cache misses and branch prediction errors
happen, only a real world test will be able to show if DDR 333 is
sufficient, insufficient, or overkill.
This is purely conjecture on my part:
Your question really struck my interest and although I haven't had the
time to do the math for theoretical performance, getting the hardware
to test is at least 9 to 12 months away for me, so hopefully someone
else will do that work. =) My suspicion is that since the core speed
and the front side bus speed of the G5 are so closely matched that this
is really just "growth room" so that the core speed can be scaled up
over time without worrying as much about how to feed data to it. I also
suspect that (theoretically) the DDR 333 wouldn't be able to keep up
with the FSB speed without pipeline stalls, but I doubt the core is
going to be able to consume data at a greater rate that the DDR 333 can
supply right now.
As far as sticking DDR 266 into a new G5 I would say is doubtful. At
best case the hardware would be able to "compensate" for it although I
suspect there would be a lot of stalls and errors during high loads, or
possibly the hardware would not recognize it at all. Yeah, that is a
really vague cop-out answer, but my understanding of Mac firmware is
not very deep. =(
I look forward to hearing other comments on this topic and please feel
free to correct me if I have said anything blatantly wrong.
-Ron
On Saturday, June 28, 2003, at 05:41 AM, Thierry de Coulon wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This is quite off topic but since there should be Mac specialists
> around....
> I've seen the new G5 Macs come with 333Mhz DDR. I've also come across
> infos
> that DDR 333 only brings 5-8% speed incrase. Now the question is: if
> you have
> DDR 266 modules, will a Mac G5 accept them (PC Bios should provide a
> possibility to set the speed, but I'm not aware of any such
> possibility on a
> Mac)?
>
> Thierry
>
> --
> Smile . . . tomorrow will be worse.
>
> _______________________________________________
> yellowdog-general mailing list
> yellowdog-general@lists.terrasoftsolutions.com
> http://lists.terrasoftsolutions.com/mailman/listinfo/yellowdog-general
>