Trying to Install YDL on G3 Beige
Alexander Holst
yellowdog-general@lists.terrasoftsolutions.com
Thu Apr 8 10:57:02 2004
Hi Lola,
Am 08.04.2004 um 14:40 schrieb
yellowdog-general-request@lists.terrasoftsolutions.com:
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 20:41:53 -0400
> To: yellowdog-general@lists.terrasoftsolutions.com
> From: Lola Lee <lola@his.com>
> Subject: Trying to Install YDL on G3 Beige
> Reply-To: yellowdog-general@lists.terrasoftsolutions.com
>
> I'm trying to install Yellow Dog Linux 3.0.1 on my G3 desktop
> machine. The problem is when I select the local CDROM as the
> installation method, I get "The Yellow Dog Linux CD was not found in
> any of your cdrom drives. Please insert the YDL cd and click OK to
> retry".
>
> Backing up a bit, I had an 160GB hard drive installed, made it the
> master drive. The original drive is now the slave drive, as is the
> CD ROM drive.
You might already be in trouble here :(
There were two Revisions of the Beige G3s, one capable of handling two
devices per IDE Bus (Rev. 2), the other not (Rev. 1). Do you know what
Revision you have? They can be identified by the graphics chip on the
mainboard:
Rev. 1 has an ATI Rage II chip
Rev. 2 has an ATI Rage Pro chip
I do have two Rev.1 beige G3 233/DTs running YDL 3.0.1 - so it is
possible :) The only bummer is I can not attach additional devices to
the IDE Buses. It is very well possible though to put a PCI card in the
machine. I have several machines here at wor that have Promise Ultra100
controllers - they are supported out of the box with the stock YDL
kernels.
It could also be possible that the installer expects the CDROM to be a
master device (like hdc) and not a slave, in case your G3 does allow
for two devices per IDE bus.
>> The Mac OS *must* be installed within a single partition within the
>> first 8 GB of the boot drive. Is this how you have it set up?
>
>
> Right. I don't remember how the Drive Utility labels the partitions,
> but I do remember that I specified 2 partitions, the bottom one being
> 30GB and the top one the rest of the HD. I installed OS 9 into the
> bottom partition. Maybe the partition should actually be the other
> way around? And are you saying that partition 1 must be exactly 8GB?
The Drive SetUp Util does list the partitions in order from top to
bottom. So the top partiton will be the first HFS partiton on the disk,
the next one the second and so on. As you are installing all the OS9
drivers in order to be able to boot MacOS 9, there will be some
additional partitions before the first usable HFS partition on the
disk.
Depending on which drive setup util you are using this can be as many
as four or five partitions. So your partitions seen from Linux will
have higher numbers (sample output from pdisk of a drive partitioned
with Drive Setup from OS9.1):
Partition map (with 512 byte blocks) on '/dev/sda'
#: type name length base ( size )
1: Apple_partition_map Apple 63 @ 1
2: Apple_Driver43*Macintosh 54 @ 64
3: Apple_Driver43*Macintosh 74 @ 118
4: Apple_Driver_IOKit Macintosh 512 @ 192
5: Apple_Patches Patch Partition 512 @ 704
6: Apple_HFS "Boot_Linux" 204800 @ 1216 (100.0M)
7: Apple_UNIX_SVR2 swap 524288 @ 206016 (256.0M)
8: Apple_UNIX_SVR2 backup 3448560 @ 730304 ( 1.6G)
9: Apple_Free Extra 10 @ 4178864
Device block size=512, Number of Blocks=4178874 (2.0G)
DeviceType=0x0, DeviceId=0x0
Drivers-
1: 23 @ 64, type=0x1
2: 36 @ 118, type=0xffff
I was never able to find out, whether the first _usable_ HFS partition
has to be 8GB or smaller, or has to be _within_ the first 8 GB of the
drive! I always used less than 8GB for the first partition to be on the
safe side. Up to untill now, I was under the impression that limit was
only important when installing OSX, I never tried to install OS9 only
on a partition >8GB though.
Alexander Holst
Pforzheim University of Applied Sciences
<holst [at] fh-pforzheim [dot] de>
ph: +49 [0]7231 28-6837
fx: +49 [0]7231 28-6040