[OT] really?
Rick Thomas
rbthomas55 at pobox.com
Fri Jun 10 23:37:48 MDT 2005
On Jun 7, 2005, at 3:20 PM, Eric Dunbar wrote:
> Plus, what this means is that Apple's future doesn't have to be
> exclusively tied to its hardware. With Apple running on X86 Dell now
> has a much stronger stick with which to beat Microsoft into
> submission, and, if necessary, Apple can become the OS supplier of
> choice for one of the big manufacturers.
Don't get your hopes up. Remember what happened to the PowerPC Mac
clone makers. Apple believes -- rightly or wrongly -- that selling the
hardware their OS runs on is vital to their bottom line.
Also, consider this: If Apple allows MacOS-X to run on commodity
hardware, lots of people will decide to try it out on their own
(commodity) PCs - just "borrow" an install DVD from a friend and give
it a go. Some part of those people will be convinced that OS-X is
better than Windows for their needs. Microsoft will see this as
competition. Their monopolist reflexes will take take over. They will
immediately proceed to squash the competition (Apple) like an annoying
bug. All MS has to do is withdraw support for MS-Office for Mac, and
Apple disappears in a cloud of slightly bad-smelling smoke.
Rick, the eternal pessimist
More information about the yellowdog-general
mailing list