2.6.11

[Cian Duffy]

Well, he's still a major contributor to the PPC side of things. I
think the semi-death of the penguinppc.org site as the source for PPC
kernels is that recently, they've been getting more and more success
in getting PPC specific patches into the general kernel, what with
Linux/PPC64 being a pretty major server platform, and so forth.

If the PPC checkins got horribly slow again, I'm sure we'll see BenH
kernels returning. Which wouldn't nessacerily be a bad thing - they'd
probably be better for PPC than normal kernels patched up.

Cian


On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 12:53:15 -0500, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D.
<joseph_sacco at comcast.net> wrote:
> I miss the days of the Ben H. kernels.  Ben H. took care of "our"
> interests.
> 
> -Joseph
> 
> =========================================================================
> On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 11:44, Owen Stampflee wrote:
> > 2.6.11 scares me.
> >
> > No sleep isnt integrated, no iMac G5 support is integrated. In fact, it
> > appears that every patch I shipped in 2.6.10, I'll need to ship in
> > 2.6.11 :)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > yellowdog-general mailing list
> > yellowdog-general at lists.terrasoftsolutions.com
> > http://lists.terrasoftsolutions.com/mailman/listinfo/yellowdog-general
> > HINT: to Google archives, try  '<keywords> site:terrasoftsolutions.com'
> --
> joseph_sacco[at]comcast[dot]net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> yellowdog-general mailing list
> yellowdog-general at lists.terrasoftsolutions.com
> http://lists.terrasoftsolutions.com/mailman/listinfo/yellowdog-general
> HINT: to Google archives, try  '<keywords> site:terrasoftsolutions.com'
> 


-- 
---------------------------
"We're busy running out of time"
Bernard Sumner, 1993