Subject: Re: kde 2.2 were coming soon?
From: Kevin B. Hendricks (khendricks@ivey.uwo.ca)
Date: Sat Aug 25 2001 - 08:25:15 MDT
Hi Dan,
grep seems to work fine. The problem is that some of the lines to be
stripped out have the path name in double quotes like this line:
%attr(-,root,root) "/usr/bin/kcheckpass"
But the grep command is telling it to strip out /bin/checkpass only when it
occurs at the end of the text line (that is what the $ does in grep).
The line in question does not meet that critieria since the double quote (")
is actually at the end of the line.
Further down in the file you sent to me you will see lines without double
quotes.
%attr(-,root,root) /usr/lib/libtaskbarextension.so
My guess is that the problem is an inadvertant set of quotes placed somewhere
earlier in the spec file (probably to support spaces in paths).
You could try editing the spec file to look like the following:
Previously it said:
cat $RPM_BUILD_DIR/file.list.%{name} |grep -v '/bin/kdesud$' |
Make it say:
cat $RPM_BUILD_DIR/file.list.%{name} | tr -d '"' |grep -v '/bin/kdesud$' |
This will strip out the double quotes before entering the grep pipe and all
should be fine. The only thing that may mess it up might be pathnames with
spaces.
If you send me the entire .spec file I will check it to see where the extra
quotes come from.
Also, another solution might be to duplicate every one of the grep -v
commands that ends with $ to also strip out that same line ending with "$
That will also work but it would mean adding the following lines to the grep
command
| grep -v '/usr/bin"$' \
| grep -v '/usr/lib"$' \
| grep -v '/usr/share"$' \
| grep -v '/usr"$' \
| grep -v '/usr/sbin"$' \
| grep -v '/usr/share"$' \
| grep -v '/usr/bin/konsole_grantpty"$' \
| grep -v '/usr/X11R6/lib"$' \
| grep -v '/usr/X11R6"$' \
Before it gets redirected into the output file.
Let me know if either of these solutions does not do the trick.
Hope this helps.
Kevin
On Thursday 23 August 2001 06:02, Dan Burcaw wrote:
> On Thursday 23 August 2001 12:57, you wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > I have been on both ftp.kde.org and some of the mirror sites and can not
> > find the YDL2 KDE 2.2 srpms and rpms anyplace that you hinted might be
> > coming soon?
> >
> > Are these still coming?
>
> Yes. I'm having problems with the packaging of kdebase.
>
> I'm finding that 'grep -v' doesn't seem to work as advertised.
>
> cat $RPM_BUILD_DIR/file.list.%{name} |grep -v '/bin/kdesud$' |grep -v '/
> bin/kcheckpass$' |grep -v '/usr/share/config' |grep -v '/etc' |grep -v
> '/usr/bin
> $' |grep -v '/usr/lib$' |grep -v '/usr/share$' |grep -v '/usr$' |grep -v
> '/usr/s
> bin$' |grep -v '/usr/share$' |grep -v '/usr/bin/konsole_grantpty$' |grep -v
> '/us
> r/include' |grep -v '/usr/X11R6/lib$' |grep -v '/usr/X11R6$' |grep -v
> 'libccont\
> .a' >$RPM_BUILD_DIR/file.list.%{name}.tmp
> mv -f $RPM_BUILD_DIR/file.list.%{name}.tmp $RPM_BUILD_DIR/file.list.%{na
>
>
>
> That particular part of the spec file is not working properly.
> I get duplicate entry packaging errors when %files is processing.
>
> Any help on this would be appreciated :)
>
> Franz Sirl has this built on a 2.0 box upgraded to latest rawhide
> stuff, but I don't want to upgrade our development environment
> just to release 2.2 KDE rpms.
>
> > That brings up a another point? Is YDL planning to have any particular
> > "contributed" archive for SRPMS and RPMS that people build and
> > contribute.
>
> There is a contrib/ direcetory right now.
> I need to talk to our main mirrors about how to facilitate uploading.
>
> > The reason I ask is that there are a lot of new things coming down the
> > pike (or already here).
> >
> > - kde 2.2
> > - glibc 2.2.4 and fast after glibc-2.2.5 (compatible with gcc -3.X)
> > - gcc 3.0.1 has already been released
> > - Openoffice 638 will probably be released by next week
> > - JDK 1.3.1 may follow along soon if it passes the JCK tests
> > - new kernels
> > - mozilla 0.9.3 and mozilla 0.9.4 (targeted for mid Sept?)
> > -etc
> >
> > If you had a "contributed section" (possibly with a limited number of
> > "trusted" developers able to contribute) it would certainly help take
> > the load off
> > of your shoulders.
> >
> > Also given the glibc-2.2.4 versioned symbols and gcc 3 C++ abi breakage,
> > having a contrib section split into a glibc-2.2.1/gcc-2.95.4 for users
> > of YDL 2.0 versus a glibc-2.2.5/gcc3.X for something like YDL 2.1 might
> > be useful.
>
> Sounds good. Let's talk about this more once I find out about uploading,
> etc.
>
> > Just my 2 cents.
> >
> > Kevin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Sat Aug 25 2001 - 07:33:25 MDT