Subject: Re: traceroute broken on YDL 2.0?
From: Jason McIntosh (jwm05c@mizzou.edu)
Date: Mon Jul 30 2001 - 08:56:44 MDT
Last I used, I found the rsync kernels on BenH to be quite nice. I have
my powerbook running a version right now, and it's pretty nicely stable
and feature rich.
Cheers!
Jason
/------------------------------------|-------------------------\
| Jason McIntosh | CELL: 573-424-7612 |
| Webmaster, thinker, etc. | WORK: 573-884-3865 |
| http://web.missouri.edu/~c717990/ | |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|"How should I know if it works? That's what beta testers are |
|for. I only coded it." |
|(Attributed to Linus Torvalds, somewhere in a posting) |
\------------------------------------|-------------------------/
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:
> Hi Jeramy,
>
> On Monday 30 July 2001 10:27, you wrote:
> > Works fine on 2.4.4.
>
> I wonder if this is a compile against 2.4.X kernel header issue?
>
> I really don't like not having kernel headers in sync with the actual kernel
> I am using.
>
> Has anyone tried BenH's latest kernels via rsync? Are they working well? Is
> there a specific 2.4.X kernel repository (bitkeeper versus, BenH's rsync,
> versus ...) that anyone can recommend one over the other?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Mon Jul 30 2001 - 08:05:04 MDT