Re: NFS between private subnets

Subject: Re: NFS between private subnets
From: Ken Schweigert (ken@byte-productions.com)
Date: Mon Feb 11 2002 - 13:05:55 MST

John,

Are you able to communicate between the subnets? ping,traceroute?

> 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.255 U 0 0 0 eth0

With the netmask having 4 octets of 255 for your 192.168.1.0 subnet
would specify a single IP. I believe it should be 255.255.255.0

That was the first thing that jumped out at me.

HTH 

-- 
-Ken Schweigert, Aspiring Network Administrator
Byte Productions, LLC
http://www.byte-productions.com

On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 12:05:47PM +0100, John Duarte wrote:
> I am trying to allow NFS access between two private subnets. The
> masquerading appears to be causing me some trouble. Here's my set up.
> 
> router
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination	Gateway	Genmask		Flags	Metric	Ref	Use	Iface
> 192.168.1.3	*	255.255.255.255	UH	0	0	0	eth0
> 192.168.2.3	*	255.255.255.255	UH	0	0	0	eth1
> 192.168.2.0	*	255.255.255.0	U	0	0	0	eth1
> 192.168.1.0	*	255.255.255.255	U	0	0	0	eth0
> 127.0.0.0		*	255.0.0.0		U	0	0
> 	0	lo
> 
> #ipchains -L
> Chain input (policy ACCEPT):
> Chain forward (policy ACCEPT):
> target	prot	opt	source		destination	ports
> MASQ	all	------	192.168.1.0/24	192.168.2.0/24	n/a
> MASQ	all	------	192.168.2.0/24	192.168.1.0/24	n/a
> ACCEPT	all	------	192.168.1.0/24	192.168.2.0/24	n/a
> ACCEPT	all	------	192.168.2.0/24	192.168.1.0/24	n/a
> Chain output (policy ACCEPT):
> 
> I've inserted the ip_masq_ftp module to allow ftp to get around the
> masquerading problem. Is there a similar fix for NFS?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> ---------------------------
> John Duarte	Key Lithograph, 2050 NW Vaughn St., Portland, OR 97209
> 		Ph: 503-222-9191	Fx: 503-248-9974
> e-mail: john@keylitho.com
> ---------------------------
> 
> 
>

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Mon Feb 11 2002 - 13:21:06 MST