Re: MOL-rsync vs. Benh rsync...

Subject: Re: MOL-rsync vs. Benh rsync...
From: Jens Schmalzing (jens.schmalzing@physik.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Thu Sep 27 2001 - 06:58:36 MDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Fernando Rodriguez: "Mol 0.9.60 not compiling under Linux-2.4.10"
• Previous message: Wilhelm *Rafial* Fitzpatrick: "Re: MOL-rsync vs. Benh rsync..."
• In reply to: Michael Coyle: "MOL-rsync vs. Benh rsync..."
• Reply: Jens Schmalzing: "Re: MOL-rsync vs. Benh rsync..."

Hi,

Michael Coyle writes:

> I have a beautiful ben kernel up and running (vmlinux-2.4.10-ben0)
> and that means a rebuild of MOL!

Strictly speaking, a new kernel only means a rebuild of the
Mac-on-Linux kernel modules. I believe that Samuel added support for
compiling them separately to the Makefile.

> The latest mol-rsync craps out

> Any ideas?

Why not go with the released version instead of the cutting edge?

Regards, Jens.

-- 
J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe!
Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz je pézqbpbe je djuz tqtaj!

• Next message: Fernando Rodriguez: "Mol 0.9.60 not compiling under Linux-2.4.10"
• Previous message: Wilhelm *Rafial* Fitzpatrick: "Re: MOL-rsync vs. Benh rsync..."
• In reply to: Michael Coyle: "MOL-rsync vs. Benh rsync..."
• Reply: Jens Schmalzing: "Re: MOL-rsync vs. Benh rsync..."

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Thu Sep 27 2001 - 06:08:33 MDT