Which package needed for "make modules"

[Marc-Olivier Killijian]

--=-fhm5Zut61P3Y7jPw8Cqc
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Jens,

> > I got my current kernel from an <apt-get install
> > kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc>
>=20
> There is no such package in Debian.  You probably have
> kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-pmac.

That's right.

>=20
> > and the sources from an <apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.25>.
>=20
> This is not the source tree your kernel is built from.  If you want
> that, use 'apt-get source kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-pmac', which
> will pull in everything that is needed to rebuild your kernel. You
> probably don't want to rebuild your kernel at all, but since you bring
> it up ...

With 'apt-get source kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-pmac' I get a directory
called kernel-patch-2.4.25-powerpc-2.4.25. I guess I should use
make-kpkg to compile kernel-source-2.4.25 using those patches. How ? It
is not a "simple" diff patch but a complete directory with plain files
and diff files.

> > When I try to do a make modules in mol-rsync, it uses the 2.4.25
> > sources, fine.
>=20
> There is no need to get the whole rsync tree if you want to use mol in
> Debian.  Just install the Debian packages.  If they don't work, find
> out what is wrong.  If it's my fault, report a bug.

OK, I have two versions of mol installed, the rsync'ed and the Debian
pkg .... I'll try to clean things a little bit. How to do a "make
uninstall" for the rsync version ?

>=20
> > But when I try to run startmol, it complains that the modules are
> > built for 2.4.25 and not for 2.4.25-powerpc.
>=20
> Of course, since you were not using the correct source tree in the
> first place (see above).
>=20
> > I installed mol-modules-2.4.25-powerpc but it doesn't seem to be used.
>=20
> The Debian packages for the mol modules are built for the Debian
> package for mol.  But you should be able to run 'modprobe mol' and
> then find the module in the output of 'lsmod'.  Running your
> self-built emulator on top of that module is a different issue, it may
> be possible or not.

It's quite unclear, see :

tsfmok# modprobe mol

tsfmok# startmol
Mac-on-Linux 0.9.71-pre1 [mar 29 2004 17:03]
Copyright (C) 1997-2004 Samuel Rydh
Starting MOL session 0
Removing stale lockfile /var/lock/mol-0
Fatal error: The MOL kernel module is not loaded
=20
tsfmok# lsmod
Module                  Size  Used by    Not tainted
ipt_MASQUERADE          1792   0  (autoclean)
iptable_nat            18306   0  (autoclean) [ipt_MASQUERADE]
ip_conntrack           22124   0  (autoclean) [ipt_MASQUERADE
iptable_nat]
ip_tables              14688   4  [ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat]
tun                     4784   0  (autoclean)
tuner-3036              2040   0  (unused)
mol                    48548   0
snd-pcm-oss            46052   1  (autoclean)
snd-mixer-oss          14944   0  (autoclean) [snd-pcm-oss]
pcmcia_core            44424   0
appletalk              23796  12  (autoclean)
sg                     33908   0  (autoclean) (unused)
i2c-keywest             7532   0  (autoclean) (unused)
snd-powermac           37572   2
snd-pcm                67028   0  [snd-pcm-oss snd-powermac]
snd-timer              16852   0  [snd-pcm]
snd-page-alloc          6580   0  [snd-pcm]
i2c-core               14532   0  [tuner-3036 i2c-keywest snd-powermac]
snd                    38136   1  [snd-pcm-oss snd-mixer-oss
snd-powermac snd-pcm snd-timer]
soundcore               4200   3  [snd]
af_packet              15112   1  (autoclean)
hfsplus                41600   0  (autoclean)

Cheers, Marco


>=20
> Regards, Jens.

--=-fhm5Zut61P3Y7jPw8Cqc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAa+SBFa6v2Z2+PJQRAmcHAJ0epG5F2+ZLvXlOFUg7wYvByF50gwCfbByC
2heYIxyDfx4aSKlOqDAVJAk=
=3SqN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-fhm5Zut61P3Y7jPw8Cqc--