Is anyone running OS X 10.4 x86?

[John Kramar]

For the last time! It is not $4500! It is $999 if you have a paid for  
account for ADC. If you don't have a paid for account then you need  
to pay another $500.  And that will get you a Select Membership and  
the x86 development machine.

John


On Oct 11, 2005, at 10:59 AM, Jose Medeiros wrote:

> I am also a Apple user and I also paid for my Macintosh Centris 650,
> Umax Supermac 603E 200, Macintosh 7500 and my current G3. I donated
> the other systems to non profits each time I upgraded and I own a
> licenced copy of MAC OS 7, OS8 and OS 10. I am a registered developer
> with Apple and anyone registered can buy the X86 developer edition as
> long as you do not mind paying 4500.00.
>
> When Apple makes the final release of the Tiger port available for
> X86, I will buy it as well.
>
> Have a nice day, and never ASSUME.
>
> Jose
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> -----
> On 10/10/05, Sven Luther <sven.luther at wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 03:36:36PM -0700, Hex Star wrote:
>>
>>> Hey, I'm an Apple user...I actually paid for my Apple laptop and
>>> OS...it is stealing because you are using a copy of a OS without
>>> paying for it and thus you are effectively taking money away from
>>> Apple furthermore this OS being distributed isn't even meant for the
>>> public, it's supposed to be used for select developers ONLY, so yes
>>> this is stealing and illegal...why do I care so much? Simple,
>>> Micro$oft had to go to product activation due to all the pirating of
>>> their apps plus pirating probably has alot to do with their high
>>> prices since they need to offset their losses...I and the rest of  
>>> the
>>> legit Apple community don't want this to happen with Apple...but hey
>>> if you really wanna get into it wanna say what Apple has to say if I
>>> hand over your IP and copy of these discussions to them? ;-) (and  
>>> yes
>>> your IP is availible in your emails header)
>>>
>>
>> Well, whatever, this may be the case or not, but it is a dangerous  
>> precedent
>> to say that copying of non-licenced material is akin to stealing,  
>> this is what
>> the music industry is using to sue teenagers, and i think that is  
>> the most
>> moral abject kind of things to do.
>>
>> So, please say it is illegal, a copyright violation, immoral, or  
>> whatever, but
>> not theft :)
>>
>> Friendly,
>>
>> Sven Luther
>>
>