Mac-On-Mac Development.

[Jose Medeiros]

What is illegal? Running Mac OSX 86 in VMWARE? If I purchase a legal
copy of Tiger ( And I have ) then no copyright violation exists. I was
just at Mac World and spoke to several Apple executives and SE's
stating that I run it on VMWARE for testing purposes, and they
mentioned that they would bring this up at their next management
meeting with Steve Jobs.

On the other hand, I agree with you. It would be nice if VMWARE also
ported their app to run on Tiger.

Peace,

Jose Medeiros

----------------------------------------------------------

On 1/12/06, Steven McGrath <steven.mcgrath at gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, I have plenty of webspace at my site on chigeek.com.  All I am
> looking for is coders.  The main obsticle is the kernel driver.  It
> simply needs to be updated for 10.4.  From there we can start to work
> on other aspects, like sound and networking.
>
> On 1/10/06, Hex Star <hexstar at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I meant having a VMware so that various versions of MacOS could be run
> > within a MacOS on a Mac, not a PC...oh and that is illegal....*sigh*
> > why do people pirate Apple products? Especially MacOS X, one of their
> > main flagship products...it takes away money they deserve, and I for
> > one would hate for them to turn to the ways Micro$oft has turned, what
> > with increased prices, the activation system, Micro$oft also has lost
> > any innovation...illegally obtaining Apple products takes away their
> > money which may cause them to, if it happens enough, go the activation
> > way which'd suck...I don't even think they have a registration key
> > that is required for install and that could make it's way there if
> > people keep bootlegging the PC beta of OS X, plus with less money
> > there's less innovation and one of the main reasons I switched to mac
> > is because of their great innovation...so c'mon, don't bootleg Apple
> > products, of all the illegal activities you could do, do you really
> > have to chose to illegally obain Apple products? Why not instead grab
> > a copy of Micro$oft Vista?
> >
> > On 1/9/06, Jose Medeiros <jose.medeiros at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > It all ready runs in VMWARE. I've been running it for several months.
> > >
> > > Check out this link.
> > > http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=6290994&blogID=51581816
> > >
> > > Peace,
> > >
> > > Jose
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > On 1/9/06, Jose Medeiros <jose.medeiros at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > It all ready runs in VMWARE. I've been running it for several months.
> > > >
> > > > Check out this link.
> > > > http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=6290994&blogID=51581816
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Jose
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------
> > > > On 1/9/06, Hex Star <hexstar at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > oh and by the way, perhaps you guys could also mention here if you'd
> > > > > be interested in those at VMware writing a version of VMware for the
> > > > > mac so that it'd run any MacOS inside of the current OS? Please with
> > > > > your reply specify if you'd be interested in this and if I get enough
> > > > > yeses I'll send them over to those at VMware to see if we can't get a
> > > > > Mac version of VMware developed. :-) If we could get them to develop
> > > > > and support VMware for MacOS X it'd be great IMO.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 1/9/06, Hex Star <hexstar at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I'd love to have this project more developed, although I am not able
> > > > > > to do any coding I could offer webspace for the project...I'd love to
> > > > > > see this developed to the point that you could run a full MacOS 9 or
> > > > > > below and perhaps in addition all MacOS X versions without having to
> > > > > > reboot into the full on OS...VMWare for MacOS X perhaps...VMware X?
> > > > > > Anyways I'd love to see this continue to be supported and I hope this
> > > > > > project doesn't disappear.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 1/9/06, Steven McGrath <steven.mcgrath at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > I have talked to the developer of Mac-on-Mac, and he doesn't wish to
> > > > > > > further develop the application to work on 10.4, or any other future
> > > > > > > efforts.  Attached below it the email I received from him.  I am
> > > > > > > curious as to if there is anyone out there who would like to further
> > > > > > > develop the application, and pick it up from where it was dropped?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello again,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > the problem is not monetary, actually not at all and I would
> > > > > > > not feel comfortable accepting donations because I might not
> > > > > > > have success. I'm not very good in understanding someone
> > > > > > > else's code, especially not if it is rather undocumented.
> > > > > > > Samuel Rydh is the founder of the MoL project an probably wrote
> > > > > > > most of the code of the VM engine and it appears that he's not going
> > > > > > > to continue his development either. Due to the lack of G5 support
> > > > > > > and no replies to my mails (to discuss some issues in his code I
> > > > > > > don't understand) I lost my ambition to continue the development
> > > > > > > of MoM. I prefer to develop things from scratch just to know exactly
> > > > > > > what's going on but in case of MoM thats nothing you do within a
> > > > > > > couple nights that takes months and probably years.
> > > > > > > I suppose the project was doomed by the day the Intel switch was
> > > > > > > announced and I did not get any support from some more qualified
> > > > > > > open source developers (well there where some who know HTML
> > > > > > > and JavaScript but that's not very useful in this case ;-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >        -Sebastian
> > > > > > > - Hide quoted text -
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Dec 8, 2005, at 10:20 PM, Steven McGrath wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Damn, This Intel switch is causing a lot of waves to stop development
> > > > > > > > in areas such as this.  It's sad, because a lot of us would really
> > > > > > > > love to continue to use this software.  Many of us as well really
> > > > > > > > aren't looking forward to the intel switch, however would love to run
> > > > > > > > this in 10.4 and get 10.4 running inside it.  If the issue is
> > > > > > > > monetary, please let me know.  I would be happy to donate some money
> > > > > > > > to further development and help raise money.  I saw a lot of promise
> > > > > > > > in this application, and it would be sad to see it rot.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 12/8/05, Sebastian Gregorzyk <basti at bastix.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> Hi Steven,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> I am curious as to if there is any further development ongoing with
> > > > > > > >> MoM?
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I doubt it, due to the upcoming Intel switch I see no need for a
> > > > > > > >> PowerPC VM for OS X.
> > > > > > > >> I'm working on some other projects now and I don't think that I'll
> > > > > > > >> have time for MoM.
> > > > > > > >> Sorry.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>         -Sebastian
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > mol-general mailing list
> > > > > > > mol-general at lists.maconlinux.org
> > > > > > > http://lists.maconlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/mol-general
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > mol-general mailing list
> > > > > mol-general at lists.maconlinux.org
> > > > > http://lists.maconlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/mol-general
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > mol-general mailing list
> > > mol-general at lists.maconlinux.org
> > > http://lists.maconlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/mol-general
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mol-general mailing list
> > mol-general at lists.maconlinux.org
> > http://lists.maconlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/mol-general
> >
> _______________________________________________
> mol-general mailing list
> mol-general at lists.maconlinux.org
> http://lists.maconlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/mol-general
>