Mac-On-Mac Development.

[Steven McGrath]

I guess my point is that for a signifigant Intel userbase to build, it
will take a couple of years.  During that timeframe do we just accept
that there is nothing to fill this space?  Or get a few people who
would be willing to look at it, and get this thing hammered out.  I
fail to beleive that there could be that drastic an issue with the
10.4 kernel that it can't be ironed out.

On 1/15/06, Sebastian Gregorzyk <bastihome at gmx.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the problem with 10.4 compatibility is memory allocation.
> Check out version v0.21 on sourceforge which compiles
> one Tiger with GCC4 and even boots up but crashes while
> allocating the memory. I don't understand the design
> principles of the Mac-on-Linux kernel module so all
> I could do is trial and error. What I guess you have
> to figure out is how memory allocation is done in the
> 10.3 kernel module and how it is supposed to be
> done on the 10.4 kernel (darwin > 8.0). I know it
> is not Samuels job to do the OS X port but it would
> helped me much if he supplied some documentation.
> Adding audio and ethernet support to the os x port
> is not a big problem after all. But unless there is no G5
> support in the MOL module I don't see the sense.
> And while we are seeing an increasing Intel Mac
> userbase MoL and MoM becomes less and less
> significant anyway.
>
>         -Sebastian
>
>
> On 1/12/06, Steven McGrath <steven.mcgrath at gmail.com > wrote:
>  >Well, I have plenty of webspace at my site on chigeek.com.  All I am
>  >looking for is coders.  The main obsticle is the kernel driver.  It
>  >simply needs to be updated for 10.4.  From there we can start to work
>  >on other aspects, like sound and networking.
> _______________________________________________
> mol-general mailing list
> mol-general at lists.maconlinux.org
> http://lists.maconlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/mol-general
>