Weekly announcment for

Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. joseph_sacco at comcast.net
Thu Apr 7 11:43:42 MDT 2005


*FLAME OFF*

Be nice... [:-)] 

Life is about choices.  You may configure whatever desktop suits your
fancy.  There are many desktops to choose from. GNOME and KDE are only
two of the many choices.

For what it's worth... 
As reported earlier, I have successfully built KDE-3.4 using konstruct,
the GAR framework for KDE.  

	http://www.kde.org/announcements/announce-3.4.php

KDE-3.4 is a large, complex desktop with lots of interesting toys. If
there is to be a YDL-4.0.2 release before YDL-5.0 is released, I would
like to see the version of KDE updated to 3.4.

-Joseph

==============================================================================


On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 13:27, Richard June wrote:
> *FLAME ON*
> Well, I'm sure we all know that KDE is a much better choice for an environment 
> then GNOME, especially if you want to be able to set defaults and/or restrict 
> access to things. :-)
> 
> On Thursday 07 April 2005 09:31 am, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. wrote:
> > NBD...  Let me put it into perspective: It is not a show stopper.
> >
> > GNOME-2.10.0.x can be configured to build against mozilla rather than
> > firefox. However..., the gnomes [those wee folk that create the GNOME
> > desktop ???] have moved on to firefox.
> >
> > -Joseph
> >
> > ======================================================================
> >
> > On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 10:19, Andrew Zschetzsche wrote:
> > > Ahh, I have been corrected. ;)
> > >
> > > I'd have to try a RPM from Fedora's 3.90 testing build, as that has
> > > Gnome 2.10 beta.  If that doesn't work, I'm out; I'd have no idea as to
> > > what goes where.
> > >
> > > --Andy
> > >
> > > On Apr 7, 2005, at 8:56 AM, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. wrote:
> > > > Answer:
> > > >
> > > > 	rpm -ql mozilla-devel
> > > >
> > > > If you wish to build any other application that is based upon firefox,
> > > > e.g. epiphany-1.6, you will need the firefox equivalents of the include
> > > > files, libraries, etc. listed above. The current "stable" branch of
> > > > GNOME, 2.10.0.x, uses now uses firefox rather than mozilla.
> > > >
> > > > The mozilla install on YDL contains:
> > > >
> > > >         mozilla-1.7.3-2.ydl.1
> > > >         mozilla-chat-1.7.3-2.ydl.1
> > > >         mozilla-devel-1.7.3-2.ydl.1
> > > >         mozilla-dom-inspector-1.7.3-2.ydl.1
> > > >         mozilla-js-debugger-1.7.3-2.ydl.1
> > > >         mozilla-mail-1.7.3-2.ydl.1
> > > >         mozilla-nspr-1.7.3-2.ydl.1
> > > >         mozilla-nspr-devel-1.7.3-2.ydl.1
> > > >         mozilla-nss-1.7.3-2.ydl.1
> > > >         mozilla-nss-devel-1.7.3-2.ydl.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You should carefully review this list and decide which of these are
> > > > relevant to creating a developer environment for firefox.
> > > >
> > > > -Joseph
> > > >
> > > > =======================================================================
> > > > ===========
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 01:32, Richard June wrote:
> > > >> On Wednesday 06 April 2005 08:27, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. wrote:
> > > >>> It would be useful if there were also a firefox-devel, just like
> > > >>> mozilla-devel.
> > > >>
> > > >> Uhm, what would you want in firefox-devel?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > joseph_sacco[at]comcast[dot]net
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > yellowdog-general mailing list
> > > > yellowdog-general at lists.terrasoftsolutions.com
> > > > http://lists.terrasoftsolutions.com/mailman/listinfo/yellowdog-general
> > > > HINT: to Google archives, try  '<keywords> site:terrasoftsolutions.com'
> _______________________________________________
> yellowdog-general mailing list
> yellowdog-general at lists.terrasoftsolutions.com
> http://lists.terrasoftsolutions.com/mailman/listinfo/yellowdog-general
> HINT: to Google archives, try  '<keywords> site:terrasoftsolutions.com'
-- 
joseph_sacco[at]comcast[dot]net



More information about the yellowdog-general mailing list