[ydl-gen] dvi/video out on alubook 1,67 ghz (powerbook 5,6)
Benoit Chesneau
benoit at bchesneau.info
Mon Jan 16 17:00:29 MST 2006
Well, I would like to use linux+xorg on the laptop. I still can't
understand why xorg can't do dual head at least with the 20" cinema
display I have.I could have spanning screen without problem on macosx so
this shouldn't be a problem of vram.
I tried this method :
http://ozlabs.org/~jk/docs/mergefb/
But still no success. I have to investigate more.
Regards.
- Benoit
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 12:26 -0500, Derick Centeno wrote:
> Ok, Jarvis!
> At least we have discovered common ground!
>
> A minor point, truly. I'm not "keen", one way or another on
> recommending which VRAM he should use; I had been merely responding to
> what he revealed regarding his posting.
> I'm aware of the different VRAM and associated video out ports; I was
> attempting to clarify that to him. Unfortunately, he revealed only a
> little more information one posting at a time. Indeed, part of the
> difficulty is how Benoit initially described his interest or what he
> was attempting to do. So of course, anyone noticing a portion of my
> communications in responding to him could reasonably assume, as you
> did, that I had a particular intention or agenda.
>
> And yes, it is difficult to penetrate sufficiently what Dual Head
> actually means as TSS describes it; your description and analysis of
> what they did is correct. This is why my conclusion in regards to what
> Benoit was concerned about was that he was better of using OS X, -- at
> least whatever he wants to do could then get done, as opposed to
> engaging in the preliminary necessities (hacking Xorg, pulling teeth
> from TSS, and whatever else) in preparing to begin the task itself.
> Someone at TSS may be able to clarify the context of the details
> further, but I doubt that whether someone is sufficiently available to
> explain whatever may be necessary.
>
> I do have hope that Benoit is up to the challenge of hacking Xorg but
> he may prefer to just get the function he desires and move on to
> something else that truly is his actual focus. What I am "keen" on, to
> use your term, is that he achieves whatever his intention is -- as
> opposed to dealing with these preliminary difficulties which frustrates
> his intended focus. As all of us have a finite number of breaths, time
> is not just money -- it is our lives! So we each must prioritize and
> decide what is the right tool to engage upon a certain function; this
> remains uniquely dependent upon what each individual is choosing to
> work or focus on at the moment. For Benoit, whatever he currently has
> in mind, could be done faster probably within OS X.
>
> If of course, he does come up with a hack for Xorg to achieve his
> intended goal, well then that contribution to the open source community
> would be a wonderful thing! It is just, in my thinking, unfortunate
> that the old phrase, "necessity is the mother of invention" seems to
> apply again and again and again ... ad infinitum! Surely we are at the
> point that if someone (here we are referring to any potential OS) does
> something better and it is available now, my word let's go with that
> and move on to that task! That kind of thinking of course is why
> Microsoft is the behemoth it is, and why Unix and Linux are so sturdy.
> Of course, it is up to each individual to decide what that "necessity"
> is, and therein lies the difficulty as well.
>
> Ah, the joys of human existence. Reminds me of Nietzche's work, "All
> too Human", here's a link if your interested:
> http://www.publicappeal.org/library/nietzsche/
> Nietzsche_human_all_too_human/
>
> At least we are close enough in accord regarding the problems which
> Benoit faces. It is perhaps enough to wish him every possible success.
> And yes, thanks for your retraction.
>
> This was an interesting exchange for the beginning of the year, no?
>
> Best wishes...
>
> On Jan 16, 2006, at 5:41 AM, Jurvis LaSalle wrote:
>
> > I fully retract the FUD statement. It was hastily tacked on as I was
> > late leaving for a dinner appointment. My apologies for insinuating
> > that you were an Apple shill trying to get Benoit to fork out extra
> > dough for video hardware he may not need.
> > Despite your conjectures, I'm very sure the problem ultimately boils
> > down to what size display Benoit has. The 30" would require this
> > extra VRAM and dual-link dvi cable that you're so keen on. If he has
> > a 20" or 23" display, he should be able to get dual head working with
> > his current hardware and some creative editing in his xorg conf.
> > Also in dispute is just what TSS means by Dual head on that page and
> > whether or not they are stating if something is possible or just
> > supported. After reading this page:
> > http://www.yellowdoglinux.com/support/hardware/breakdown/index.php?
> > hw_cat_id=4 (where they still frustratingly only refer to the 15"
> > model with 128MB of VRAM), I can only assume that what they call
> > "external video Yes*" is what I would call dual head support. Which
> > makes clicking on the Video Information link that much more confusing
> > when it says "Dual head: Probably not..." Most likely they are
> > referring to dual-link dvi there. Perhaps someone at terra soft can
> > clarify further.
> > I will stick with my assertion that support from TSS or not, if
> > Benoit has a 20" or 23" ACD, he will be able to hack it together in
> > time with hard work and plenty of coffee. So keep hope Derick- Benoit
> > may yet be able to remain booted into linux for the foreseeable future
> > ;-D
> >
> > JL
>
>
> ========================
> "The language I speak is understood the world over."
> -- Joseph Haydn replying to Mozart's request that Haydn not travel to
> England due to his lack of familiarity with the language.
>
> _______________________________________________
> yellowdog-general mailing list
> yellowdog-general at lists.terrasoftsolutions.com
> http://lists.terrasoftsolutions.com/mailman/listinfo/yellowdog-general
> HINT: to Google archives, try '<keywords> site:terrasoftsolutions.com'
More information about the yellowdog-general
mailing list