General Linux questions
Marc Stergionis
yellowdog-newbie@lists.terrasoftsolutions.com
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 08:57:22 -0600
At sometime around 5:32 PM -0500 on 10/1/02, lowell wrote thus:
>IIRC, Mandrake is new world only (G3 and above); anybody know for sure?
>
>jasontine@access-4-free.com wrote:
>
>>2) Looking at both the Mandrake and Yellow Dog websites, it seems
>>as if Mandrake has more resources behind it, and possibly would be
>>a better long-term solution. However, as they provide solutions
>>primarily for the Intel crowd, I am not sure of their dedication to
>>the PPC platform. What are the main benefits to Yello Dog Linux
>>over Mandrake?
Lowell may be right ... I tried to install Mandrake on an 8600 last
year and it wouldn't take, but when I started checking it out it
appeared it was because Mandrake was looking for an IDE drive to
install on (wouldn't install on SCSI), although I could be wrong. New
World would seem to make more sense ...
Mandrake ran awesome on the G4-400 at the office though.
Anyway, Jason could try on the 6400 since it *does* have an IDE HD
although it's true that YDL is geared to the Mac, indeed *built* for
the Mac.
Mandrake I don't believe has any mailing lists devoted to the Mac.
Even distros such as SuSE and Debian have Mac lists (ie. SuSE-ppc and
Debian-PPC).
That said, I don't know that YDL or Mandrake would be any faster on
a 6400 than OS 9.1, or even 8.6 -- unless you do a limited install
geared to email/web and K-Office or something and make sure you
leave a good chunk of empty HD space.
OS 8.6 with Carbon extensions can run pretty up-to-date software.
My $.02.
-ms
--
Many have Montana envy ... the lucky get to live here!
Marc Stergionis
Communications/Web Specialist
Benefis Healthcare http://www.benefis.org
"Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of my employer."