[OT] Off topic [was Re: Monitor problem]

[Angela Kahealani]

On Thu, 2003-05-29 23:15, Brook Calverley wrote:
> May I make an observation? Another newsgroup I belong to has developed a
> brilliant device called [OT].
>
> It means Off Topic.
>
> Adding [OT] to the subject line of any post not directly related to Linux,
> allows uninterested subscribers the freedom to filter [OT] posts by the use
> of a simple rule.

So, the poster with the religious evangelism should have used [OT],
right?

MY signature describes only two things:
1: the url of my website so that I never have to post off topic
2: the terms and conditions and legal status of my participation.
It is required (read UCC 1-207) that I ALWAYS in EVERY case
protect my rights, or I lose them... IT'S THE LAW.

> Much as I've enjoyed reading this utterly bizarre argument [and, BTW, one
> of you is clearly nuts] I'm sure others would have been happy for the whole
> lot to have been automatically consigned to the delete file.
>
> b//

He's nuts, I'm the crazy one. Lunatic. Looney.

By dictionary defintion, if you believe differently than
the democratic majority, your beliefs are "crazy".

look it up.... it's in the dictionary. Yes, I'm crazy, my beliefs
are anything but common ordinary majority.

I would never stoop so low as to align with the insanity of 
the majority of humans living on this planet: Ter-Ra.

-- 
Copyright 2003 Angela Kahealani. http://www.kahealani.com/
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice, UCC 1-207, 
Non Assumsit, T.D.C. All information and transactions 
are private between the parties and are non negotiable.