partitioning questions

Derick Centeno aguilarojo at verizon.net
Wed Aug 10 04:38:56 MDT 2005


Er, Dave.  I really hadn't finished working on a response to your last 
question.  I was hoping that I would have time to research a few things 
before I answered that one.
And now, well..., this.

Dave, it's not good.  In short, one of the answers I was commenting 
upon was why copy programs are always those I stay away from.  They 
tend to create nonsensical readings like this which you just posted.  
And to address your NEW question, I'll comment that even you notice 
that the values can't possibly be those of an 80G drive.  I'm glad that 
you got something of YDL working but that is not enough the whole 
installation is supported by a logical "stack of cards" which I'm not 
sure why it works, but I know it should not be working like that.  
Meanwhile I'm not finished or ready to address the results of your 
enthusiasm to forge ahead.  So if you don't mind, I'll call attention 
to your situation to other's whose background and skills are at a very 
much different level than mine and whom may be able to address your 
concerns at a pace which matches your drive.  Don't do another thing 
until you hear from them, ok?

Dr. Joseph Sacco.  PAGING DR. SACCO.  YOUR ASSISTANCE ON THE NEWBIE 
LIST IS REQUESTED.  PAGING DR. SACCO...
His Lordship Owen Stampflee. Lord Stampflee, please attend...
The Honorable Illuminatus Norberto.  Please, your assistance is 
requested.

Lords.  Learned Gentlemen All.
Please assist this newbie... I was still considering one of his recent 
questions when he, via his enthusiasm, found himself into plunging 
ahead into this current woeful state.
He doesn't realize that he has nearly perfectly repeated the same 
errors he reported to the newbie list back on August 8th!
Nor did I expect that such an event would occur.
As I am already working on a previous question which he posted; would 
you kindly offer your views here.

It is still possible to assist him before the condition declines 
further.
It really can be done, if you so deign.

What follows below is for your examination so that you may follow what 
proceeded this current situation.

Derick :-)

On Aug 10, 2005, at 2:00 AM, David Froseth wrote:

> Hi again Derick,
>    I tried intalling YDL 4.0.1 and it worked!!!  I have the whole KDE 
> desktop working and internet, too!  Thanks for the help!  I have 
> wanted to try linux for a long time.
>    Still the Disk Utility picture in OS X looks strange:
>
> _______________________
> Untitled                                         512 MB
> _______________________
> Free Space                                    18.05  GB
>
> _______________________
> OS X                                             50.56  GB
>
> _______________________
> Untitled                                          18.05  GB
> _______________________
> Free Space                                      50.68 GB
>
> _______________________
> OS 9.2.2                                          5.29 GB
> _______________________
>
> The list to the left of this also reads:
>
> disk0s10
> OS X
> disk0s12
> OS 9.2.2
>
> Is this normal?  This looks very strange to me.  The GB amounts also 
> add up to way more than a 80 gig drive can hold.  Thanks for any 
> input.  And thanks again for the help.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
> David Froseth wrote:
>
>> Derick,
>>    I have finally got what I think is a good bootable backup of my OS 
>> X & 9 HD, using DiskWarrior and Carbon Copy Cloner.  I think some of 
>> my last YDL partitioning problems came from trying to copy to and 
>> swap a new hard drive into my laptop without ever doing any disk 
>> maintenance.  A little knowledge can give you enough confidence to 
>> get into big trouble.  Then you really learn something!  I think my 
>> original HD was so gummed up with borken permissions and directories 
>> that the copy hard drive I installed in my computer was a mess.  I 
>> think YDL and all other Linux distros could start by telling people 
>> that if they plan on a partitioned multi-os system then clean up the 
>> os's on the existing  partitions.  Do a disk first aid operation.
>>    I don't think you should attemt to install YDL untill you have 
>> mastered how to make a bootable clone of your OS X hard drive.  I 
>> could be way off on this, maybe it doesn't matter.  But, I have spent 
>> a week getting my new hard drive and all of my OS X programs working 
>> again.  I eventually deleted my fink /sw file and I am now reloading 
>> all of those programs.  Having to relearn all of the fink stuff again 
>> is good.  I also have gained a much deeper and valuable understanting 
>> of the underpinings of unix based os's by struggling with a fried 
>> hard drive (actually 3 fried hard drives).  Luckily I did not lose 
>> any important data.
>>    I read the YDL 2.2 guide and that made the process much more 
>> understandable.  Thanks for the advice.  In trying my next attempt to 
>> install YDL,  I got to this point and had some questions:
>>
>> Hard Drives
>>    /dev/hda
>>       /dev/hda9                Apple Bootstrap            1           
>>           2                      4
>>       /dev/hda10               swap                              512  
>>                4                     1045
>>       /dev/hda12        /      ext3                                
>> 18487              1045               38605
>>       /dev/hda11               hfs                                   
>> 51769             38605              143786
>>       /dev/hda13               hfs                                   
>> 5422               144046            155061
>>
>>
>> My questions are:
>>
>> Why does the OS X and OS 9 partitions have the number hda11 and 
>> hda13?  Why does the numbering start so high and why is 12 skipped by 
>> OSX and OS 9?
>> Where are hda1 - hda8?
>> Is hda12 going to be physically placed between hda11 and hda13?  The 
>> picture at the top of the window looked right.  The order of the 
>> Start and End points seems to be right, except for the gap between 
>> hda11 and hda13's start/end points - 143786,144046.  What does that 
>> mean?
>> Should hda11 and hda13 say hfs+?
>>
>> I hope all of these little detail questions are relevent.  Asking 
>> questions about little details can help with the big picture.  Any 
>> advice you feel like giving would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks again,
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>> Derick Centeno wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dave:
>>> Here is a link to a TSS page which you really do want to read before 
>>>  going any farther:
>>>
>>> http://www.terrasoftsolutions.com/support/installation/ 
>>> guide2.2.shtml#install
>>>
>>> Red Hat is useful sometimes but remember they couldn't care less 
>>> about  OS 9 or other non-PC partitioning schemes so the likely hood 
>>> of you  finding anything other than references to detailed 
>>> applications in  Linux is really, really remote.  In other words, 
>>> you are in a Apple  PowerPC universe and those are the only 
>>> references which are going to  be helpful.  If you wish to learn 
>>> about details regarding creating  mount points within Linux and so 
>>> on that is fine to use Red Hat but  they will not tell you what a 
>>> MacOS partition looks like within Linux  using any application like 
>>> pdisk or parted (partition editor).  The  page I found, created by 
>>> TSS the makers of YDL, will!  That's what you  need.
>>>
>>> Attention: Although the page refers to YDL 2.2, the partitioning and 
>>>  mount point instructions are consistent across all versions of YDL 
>>> for  Macs.  This will continue until Apple finally actually switches 
>>> to  Intell and then everyone must consider to either stay with 
>>> PowerPC  systems and move up to Genesi/Pegasos hardware or follow 
>>> Apple or just  throw up one's hands and use PCs or Sun's or whatever 
>>> else is out  there.  May a HAL 2000 anyone? :-)
>>>
>>> Oh yes... I forgot.  After Apple switches to Intel, then maybe Red 
>>> Hat  may show an interest in serving the users of the New Intel 
>>> based Macs  who also want to use Linux.
>>> That however will be a different list, probably not this one.
>>>
>>> Best wishes...
>>>
>>> On Aug 8, 2005, at 5:03 PM, David Froseth wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Derick for the quick response.  It helped.  From now on I 
>>>> will  only do this critical setup manually.  More questions.  I 
>>>> understand  that the untitled spaces are linux partitions that OS X 
>>>> does not  recognize.  Initially when I tried to manually input the 
>>>> partition  info I was asked for a mount point.  The manual 
>>>> partitioning would not  continue unless I fill this in.  Page 5 of 
>>>> the "A Companion to Install  YDL" does not tell you what to do.  I 
>>>> want to make sure I use up all  of the free space and also put the 
>>>> linux partitions in front of the OS  X and OS 9 partitions.  Any 
>>>> explaination on how to control  the spot  on the hard drive where 
>>>> the partitions reside?  Thanks for any advice.   I found some disk 
>>>> druid tutorials on the net which are geared to Red  Hat,  I will 
>>>> study them to see if I can figure this out more.  Thanks  again.
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> yellowdog-newbie mailing list
>>> yellowdog-newbie at lists.terrasoftsolutions.com
>>> http://lists.terrasoftsolutions.com/mailman/listinfo/yellowdog-newbie
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> yellowdog-newbie mailing list
>> yellowdog-newbie at lists.terrasoftsolutions.com
>> http://lists.terrasoftsolutions.com/mailman/listinfo/yellowdog-newbie
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yellowdog-newbie mailing list
> yellowdog-newbie at lists.terrasoftsolutions.com
> http://lists.terrasoftsolutions.com/mailman/listinfo/yellowdog-newbie
>



More information about the yellowdog-newbie mailing list