Subject: Re: Kernel 2.4.8, XFree86 4.1.0 (fwd)
From: Sundar Amancherla (amancherla.3@osu.edu)
Date: Thu Aug 23 2001 - 12:09:54 MDT
I am sorry I did not cc to correct ydl-devel address. Thanks Bill.
-- Aman
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:56:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sundar Amancherla <amancherla.3@osu.edu>
To: Bill Fink <billfink@capu.net>
Cc: yellowdog-devel@lists.yellowdoglinux.co
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.4.8, XFree86 4.1.0
Bill,
Thank you so very much. "mol" works great now!
Regards,
--Aman
on Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Bill Fink wrote:
> On Wed Aug 22 2001, Sundar Amancherla wrote:
>
> > I am not sure whether I am asking this at the right place. The question is
> > about "mol". Since I changed the kernel. I recompiled
> > mol-0.9.59-1a.src.rpm and mol-kmods-0.9.59-1.src.rpm. Now when I startmol
> > after molvconfig, this is the stdout/stderr.
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > =================================================================
> > Mac-on-Linux 0.9.59 <www.maconlinux.org>
> > (C) 1997-2001 Samuel Rydh <samuel@ibrium.se>
> > =================================================================
> > Loading the Mac-on-Linux kernel module.
> > /usr/lib/mol/modules/mol.o: unresolved symbol MUNGE_CONTEXT
>
> Aman,
>
> The mol-0.9.59-1a.src.rpm and mol-kmods-0.9.59-1.src.rpm RPMs that
> come with YDL 2.0 require the attached patches (slightly modified from
> one posted by Samuel Rydh to apply cleanly) to build properly on newer
> 2.4 kernels because of a change to the memory management organization.
> Alternatively, you can try the newer experimental 0.9.60 version of mol.
> I can only vouch for this with the 2.4.6 kernel, but it'll hopefully
> also work fine with even newer 2.4 kernels.
>
> -Bill
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Thu Aug 23 2001 - 11:19:57 MDT