Re: Only for 603 owners...A compiled kernel forMOL -- Poor form.


Subject: Re: Only for 603 owners...A compiled kernel forMOL -- Poor form.
From: Brandyn Webb (brandyn@sifter.org)
Date: Wed Feb 14 2001 - 21:17:15 MST


At 6:27 PM -0600 2/14/01, Supernaut wrote:
>What really honks me, is, I attempted to reply to the individual
>responsible, directly, and, unfortunately, the damn coward dosent have a
>legit return addy. No such domain. So, my guess is, this person is a list
>regular, someone familiar with 603 probs, who decided to post anon because
>he knew it would piss off a lot of people.

        Or maybe the binary includes a trojan horse or two.

        -Brandyn

---------- brandyn@sifter.org ------- http://www.sifter.org/~brandyn ----------

             Uniformity makes the worst better and the best worse.

             Corollary: Those who seek the best shun uniformity;
                        those who fear the worst seek it.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Wed Feb 14 2001 - 21:22:22 MST