Subject: Re: Full screen capable? [OT]
From: Wilhelm Fitzpatrick (rafial@well.com)
Date: Wed Jun 27 2001 - 12:30:07 MDT
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Derrik Pates wrote:
> Well, Wine and MoL take a totally different approach - Wine incorporates a
> native-format binary loader and an (ever more complete) ABI, running the
> individual programs directly. MoL just implements a few emulated devices,
> loads a ROM image, and manages to trick MacOS into thinking it's running
> on a complete machine unto itself, making it happy.
Excellent point, MOL is better compared to vmware than to WINE. The
equivalent of WINE for MacOS binaries would be Executor (a closed source
product), although Executor does include a 68k emulator in addition to a
replicated MacOS ABI, whereas WINE only reproduces the ABI.
-raf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Wed Jun 27 2001 - 11:35:36 MDT