Installing XINE
Matthias Saou
yellowdog-general@lists.terrasoftsolutions.com
Wed May 21 02:50:01 2003
Bill Fink wrote :
> > This is what I did:
> >
> > tar -zxvf xine-lib-1-beta12.tar.gz
> > cd xine-lib-1-beta12
> > ./configure
> > make
> > su -c "make install"
> > su -c "/sbin/ldconfig"
> > tar -zxvf xine-ui-0.9.20.tar.gz
> > cd xine-ui-0.9.20
> > ./configure
> > make
> > su -c "make install"
> > xine-check
> > xine enterthematrix_020503_osiris320.mov
>
> It's even easier than that to build xine from source:
>
> rpm -ta xine-lib-1-beta12.tar.gz
> rpm -U /usr/src/rpm/RPMS/ppc/libxine1-1_beta12-1.ppc.rpm
> /usr/src/rpm/RPMS/ppc/libxine1-devel-1_beta12-1.ppc.rpm rpm -ta
> xine-ui-0.9.21.tar.gz rpm -U
> /usr/src/rpm/RPMS/ppc/xine-ui-0.9.21-1.ppc.rpm
Alright, this is by far the best "installing from sources" method, but
still. I'll be quite partial on this, but I just want to mention some
reasons for installing from binary packages :
- You keep your system cleaner, easier to manage
- Upgrading to the next version is much easier, no old libs in the way
- Changed configuration files are automatically saved (n/a with xine)
- You usually get something "known to work"
- You usually get support for useful extra features (faad2, xvid, flac...)
- You usually get better system integration (init script, menu entry)
- You usually get apt/yum support for lightening quick installs! ;-)
And there are many others IMHO.
Matthias
--
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Raw Hide 20030519 running Linux kernel 2.4.20-13.9
Load : 0.01 0.17 0.43