Firewire on B+W G3 Rev1

Norberto Quintanar yellowdog-general@lists.terrasoftsolutions.com
Thu Feb 26 18:31:01 2004


I once tried to install a non-OHCI firewire card in my YDL box.  If
someone asked me to do it again, I would immediately  make an
appointment that day with the dentist for the root cananl I've been
putting off.  It's not worth it, because even if you finally get it
recognized, most of what you'll plug into it won't recognize it.  So
you'll still be SOL.  Do yourself a favor, get an OHCI compliant
card.  Here's a link to explain all the headaches and what nots...


http://thetechnozone.com/videobuyersguide/capturecards/IEEE1394cards.html


--- Tim Seufert <tas@mindspring.com> wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2004, at 7:48 AM, Henry A. Leinhos wrote:
> 
> > At this point, the ieee1394, pcilynx, raw1394, and sbp2 modules
> all 
> > load fine, but the dv1394 and video1394 modules fail (depend on 
> > ohci1394).  I think I need the video1394 module to export video
> to 
> > firewire (in kino, at least).  Can anyone help me on this?
> 
> You're probably going to have to get an OHCI PCI firewire card.  As
> 
> you've discovered, the B&W G3 uses a PCILynx controller.  In the
> early 
> days of Firewire, there was a bit of evolution in how host
> controllers 
> interacted with the OS and applications.  The result was the OHCI
> spec. 
>   Unfortunately, PCILynx predated all that, and has a different 
> controller architecture than OHCI.  This means that it takes extra
> work 
> to get some kinds of software to work with PCILynx controllers, and
> 
> that work hasn't always been done for Linux.  As you've found here,
> 
> dv1394 and video1394 simply assume you have an OHCI controller.
> 
> Even under MacOS / MacOS X, where the 1394 driver stacks apparently
> 
> provide a more complete abstraction model to hide whether the 
> controller is OHCI or something else, PCILynx doesn't always work
> quite 
> right.
> 
> So, in a lot of cases, people just end up buying an OHCI
> controller.  
> Look for ones with a TI chipset if you can.  (PCILynx isn't bad
> because 
> TI made it, it's actually rather good for a 1394 controller of its
> era. 
>   In my experience TI's OHCI chips are quite good.)


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools