[OT] Re: Monitor problem

Fri, 30 May 2003 08:52:55 -0400

Pedro,

Actually, I was (and still am) profoundly offended by Bert's signature. 
  However
The list is not the proper forum for any discussions I might choose to 
have with
him about it.

Enphilistor

On Friday, May 30, 2003, at 06:19 AM, Pedro Gutierrez wrote:

> Goofus,
>
> I side with you but I think calling her 'bitch' isn't the way to go. 
> You should apologize.
>
> Angela: it seems that you won't quit until everyone agrees with you. 
> Have you noticed that nobody else was offended by Bert's random sig? 
> I'm not saying that what everybody accepts is true and good, but you 
> have made your point that you don't like those, and when sigs talk 
> about spirituality/politics you are offended. That's ok, but would you 
> please stop?
>
> Your very sig is also at fault 'cause people here in this forum live 
> all over the world and copyright legislation is different. Or have you 
> read copyright law from Mexico (where I'm from) and Spain (where I'm 
> right now)?? I could find your sig offensive or even not legal from my 
> perspective. Know what? I will use my common sense and won't be 
> offended because the matter at hand is PPC Linux and your 'copyright' 
> is clearly a sig; one I thought was just a joke.
>
> I sometimes use a quote from a mexican revolution leader as a sig. 
> Someone could call it a political sig, but it isn't, at least not for 
> me. I get all kinds of mail with custom (or random) sigs and I take 
> them for what they are and move on.
>
> What you have said and done IS WAY BEYOND the purposes of this list. I 
> didn't want to get involved in the discussion but the last Goofus 
> e-mails will surely give us all a lot of your thoughts, so I decided 
> to speak up.
>
> Hoping this will stop,
>
> Pedro
>
> On Friday, May 30, 2003, at 11:44  AM, Goofus wrote:
>
>> Is there a list owner around here that can (PLEASE) boot this 
>> bitch?????
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Angela Kahealani" <angela@kahealani.com>
>> To: <yellowdog-newbie@lists.terrasoftsolutions.com>; "S.M.Kelly"
>> <SMKSensei@mac.com>
>> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 5:18 AM
>> Subject: Re: Monitor problem
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, 2003-05-29 20:03, S.M.Kelly wrote:
>>>> And if you get so easily offended by someone's INDIRECT signature 
>>>> ...
>>>
>>> Indirect? what's indirect about it?
>>> what link did I follow to get to it?
>>> It's the last four DIRECT lines of the e-mail.
>>> (we DO recall that internet standard is maximum 4 lines in the sig?)
>>>
>>>> get a life, or at least a cup of coffee!
>>>
>>> I have a life. Coffee is deleterious to health.
>>>
>>>> You live in a democracy, not communism,
>>>
>>> what, now I must also tolerate POLITICS in my inbox?
>>> FROM a LINUX forum?
>>> You have stated a lie. It IS the lie taught in the Federally
>>> Programmed State Run Brainwashing Centers for Children
>>> (public schools), but it is not the truth.
>>>
>>> YOU live as the wholly owned chattel property of a bank.
>>> When the united States of America went Bankrupt, a
>>> corporation named The United States, Inc. was formed
>>> to administer the bankruptcy for the interersts of the
>>> international bankers. A meeting of the governors of
>>> the 48 Republics (not democracies) with F.D.R. was
>>> arranged at which the entire physical property, including
>>> all the slaves on the U.S. Plantation (you) were promised
>>> along with the fruits of all  your labor, as the collateral
>>> for The United States, Inc. to get operational funding
>>> (loans) from the bankers. Your Birth Certificate, unless
>>> you redeemed it and became the holder in due course
>>> of title to your body, is the title of ownership of your
>>> body, just as houses and cars have "titles". YOU live
>>> in The Matrix, a chattel property slave. The Matrix
>>> feeds you the illusion that you are a free democrat,
>>> and that the religious beliefs presented by our other
>>> poster are true. They are lies.
>>>
>>>> therefore sometimes you just
>>>> have to put up with other people's beliefs instead of trying to shut
>>>> everybody else up but yourself.
>>>
>>> Then you're in FAVOR of SPAM?
>>>
>>> The point is I'm remaining shut-up about my spiritual beliefs
>>> because religion/spirituality are OFF TOPIC in a Linux
>>> discussion forum. I'm only demanding that everyone else
>>> equally remain shut up IN THIS FORUM about topics
>>> which are OFF TOPIC to this forum.
>>>
>>> So I guess we should merge EVERY Usenet Newsgroup into ONE...
>>> where democracy can be expressed by everyone equally. If you DON'T
>>> vote for that, then what we have is more than one forum, and
>>> certain topics are either ON or OFF topic in each forum. This is a 
>>> forum.
>>> Religion and Politics either are or are not appropriate here. PERIOD.
>>> It is not my choice to make. Listowner?
>>>
>>>> geesh, grow up people and let's talk about Linux.
>>>
>>> THANK YOU... my sentiments exactly, and the very reason
>>> I protested the religious content.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Copyright 2003 Angela Kahealani. http://www.kahealani.com/
>>> All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice, UCC 1-207,
>>> Non Assumsit, T.D.C. All information and transactions
>>> are private between the parties and are non negotiable.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> yellowdog-newbie mailing list
>>> yellowdog-newbie@lists.terrasoftsolutions.com
>>> http://lists.terrasoftsolutions.com/mailman/listinfo/yellowdog-newbie
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> yellowdog-newbie mailing list
>> yellowdog-newbie@lists.terrasoftsolutions.com
>> http://lists.terrasoftsolutions.com/mailman/listinfo/yellowdog-newbie
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yellowdog-newbie mailing list
> yellowdog-newbie@lists.terrasoftsolutions.com
> http://lists.terrasoftsolutions.com/mailman/listinfo/yellowdog-newbie
>